Guideline for publishing a journal paper

 
1. Select a suitable publication outlet:
Watch that your article is inside the degree of the journal that you are submitting to. This appears to be so clear yet it's astounding what number of articles are submitted to journals that are totally unseemly. Per. It is a dreadful sign in case you don't see the names of any people from the distribution board. Ideally look through different late issues to ensure that it is conveying articles on a comparative subject and that are of near quality and impact.
2. Try not to repeat you’re unique in the introductory letter:

We seek the initial letter for a sign from you about what you accept is most fascinating and huge about the paper, and why you think it is a strong match for the journal. There is no convincing motivation to repeat the exceptional or experience the substance of the paper in detail – we will read the paper itself to find what it says. The starting letter is a place for a more prominent picture chart, notwithstanding some other information that you may need us to have.
3. Establish a good first connection with your title and unique:
The title and theoretical are fabulously basic parts of a unique duplicate as they are the essential segments a journal administrator sees.
•The title should gather the essential subject of the article and mirror your sense of duty regarding the speculation.
•The dynamic should be made intentionally and incorporate the point and degree of the examination; the key issue to be tended to and theory; the system used; the instructive file; key revelations; constrainments; and recommendations for speculation and practice.4. Present an introductory letter with the original copy:

·   Keep as a main priority the noteworthiness of an early on letter steered to the article administrator or editor in-leader of the goal journal.

·     Likewise, the substance of the initial letter is also worth putting vitality in. Some fresh specialists stick the article's reasonable into their letter assuming it will be sufficient to display the protection for generation; it is a preparation best avoided

·     A not too bad early on letter at first charts the essential theme of the paper; second, fights the peculiarity of the paper; and third, legitimizes the hugeness of the creation to the goal journal. I would prescribe obliging the basic letter to a substantial part of a page. More critically, partners and accomplices who read the article and gave contribution before the first duplicate's convenience should be perceived in the starting letter.

5. Deliver and react to the majority of the analysts' concerns methodologically:

While resubmitting a paper following amendments, incorporate a definite report condensing every one of the progressions proposed by the analysts, and how you have changed your original copy in light of them. Adhere to the certainties, and don't tirade. Try not to react to analyst criticism when you get it. Read it, consider it for a few days, talk about it with others, and afterward draft a reaction.